 |
|
 |
|
Next: The Shroud of Turin
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Dec 22, 2005 Posts: 1018
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:23 pm
Post subject: Met Samson et Delilah Review Archived from groups: rec>music>opera (more info?)
|
|
|
I wish to review the first Met Samson and
Delilah of the present season. Generally speaking,it was a satisfying,
but not memorable show. The orchestra and especially the chorus were
splendid and I found the stylized production more satisfying live than
on the previous telecast,although act two lacks the exotic flavor with
the absence of a tent and a divan. I did like the lighting effects and
the various scrims,and although the Bacchanale was not as exciting as
the previous Met production, it was still quite fine,and a highlight of
the evening.
Marina Domashenko has a very beautiful and rich voice,and act one
was especially affecting, but she lacks the power for the heavier act
two declamatory scenes, and the lower voice is practically inaudible in
a role that demands a Shirley Verrett or a Rise Stevens to make the
proper impact. I would prefer to see her in a work that was more lyric
throughout, but it is really a beautiful instrument.
Clifton Forbis possess a truly Wagnerian size voice.It is
not especially beautiful,and at times tends toward throatiness,
although the Mill Scene and last scene showed much more of a clearer
quality. The top is quite brilliant,and he was a very fine Samson.I did
not find myself upset that Placido did not sing, because Mr.Forbis was
much more than adequate.The only resemblance to Placido was that the
last note was totally hoarse, but we can forgive both Mr.Forbis and the
fine Placido. I only wish the effect of the temple falling was more
spectacular. Were I a Philistine,I do not think I would be quite that
afraid (although some people think of me as a Philistine anyway.)
Messieur Lafont evoked the ugly sound of Sergei
Leiferkus. His large voice is really about 12th rate in intrinsic
quality, and while he acts well, the basic sound is totally
objectionable. I also wonder why he, a born Frenchman, sings his final
"e" vowels almost like "ey" ( e.g. "gloireh" becomes "gloirey.") It
reminded me of the bad French of Franco Corelli, but I feel that
Mr.Lafont must decide to produce these vowels in this way for some
vocal effect. I only know that there must be at least 50 baritones at
the Met who would do justice to this role.
Messrs.Coutney and Youn were fine in their act one scenes. I had a
nice time,but I would have wanted a Delilah with more heft, and a
baritone with a decent voice.
My best Charlie >> Stay informed about: Met Samson et Delilah Review |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 22, 2005 Posts: 1018
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:18 am
Post subject: Re: Met Samson et Delilah Review [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Yes indeed...a chance to read a good...on topic...post about CH's
personal
thought's of an operatic production. This is the kind of post the
great,
vast majority (if not ALL) RMO denizens find pleasure and interest in
reading.
Good post Charlie.
MANY thanks...and i do truly appreciate it,especially since we have
been "at odds."...something I never wanted.
I used to post exclusively like the articloe on Samson...but admit I
fell into the mud when I got flamed.....will try to kep my head above
water.
as ever Charlie >> Stay informed about: Met Samson et Delilah Review |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 28, 2006 Posts: 145
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:29 am
Post subject: Re: Met Samson et Delilah Review [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
>although the Bacchanale was not as exciting as
the previous Met production<
Yes, I miss the old Bacchanale also ... it was fine cheese. Also
although the old production was looking pretty tattered when I saw it,
the temple collapse was fabulous. The current one is a bit of a
disappointment. >> Stay informed about: Met Samson et Delilah Review |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 07, 2005 Posts: 695
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:49 am
Post subject: Re: Met Samson et Delilah Review [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 07, 2005 Posts: 3595
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Met Samson et Delilah Review [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Thanks for this, Charlie. I think this is about as close as I will come to a
S&D this year, based on your review.
"www.Handelmania.com" wrote in message
>
> I wish to review the first Met Samson and
> Delilah of the present season. Generally speaking,it was a satisfying,
> but not memorable show. The orchestra and especially the chorus were
> splendid and I found the stylized production more satisfying live than
> on the previous telecast,although act two lacks the exotic flavor with
> the absence of a tent and a divan. I did like the lighting effects and
> the various scrims,and although the Bacchanale was not as exciting as
> the previous Met production, it was still quite fine,and a highlight of
> the evening.
> Marina Domashenko has a very beautiful and rich voice,and act one
> was especially affecting, but she lacks the power for the heavier act
> two declamatory scenes, and the lower voice is practically inaudible in
> a role that demands a Shirley Verrett or a Rise Stevens to make the
> proper impact. I would prefer to see her in a work that was more lyric
> throughout, but it is really a beautiful instrument.
> Clifton Forbis possess a truly Wagnerian size voice.It is
> not especially beautiful,and at times tends toward throatiness,
> although the Mill Scene and last scene showed much more of a clearer
> quality. The top is quite brilliant,and he was a very fine Samson.I did
> not find myself upset that Placido did not sing, because Mr.Forbis was
> much more than adequate.The only resemblance to Placido was that the
> last note was totally hoarse, but we can forgive both Mr.Forbis and the
> fine Placido. I only wish the effect of the temple falling was more
> spectacular. Were I a Philistine,I do not think I would be quite that
> afraid (although some people think of me as a Philistine anyway.)
> Messieur Lafont evoked the ugly sound of Sergei
> Leiferkus. His large voice is really about 12th rate in intrinsic
> quality, and while he acts well, the basic sound is totally
> objectionable. I also wonder why he, a born Frenchman, sings his final
> "e" vowels almost like "ey" ( e.g. "gloireh" becomes "gloirey.") It
> reminded me of the bad French of Franco Corelli, but I feel that
> Mr.Lafont must decide to produce these vowels in this way for some
> vocal effect. I only know that there must be at least 50 baritones at
> the Met who would do justice to this role.
> Messrs.Coutney and Youn were fine in their act one scenes. I had a
> nice time,but I would have wanted a Delilah with more heft, and a
> baritone with a decent voice.
> My best Charlie
> >> Stay informed about: Met Samson et Delilah Review |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 07, 2005 Posts: 776
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Met Samson et Delilah Review [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Yes indeed...a chance to read a good...on topic...post about CH's personal
thought's of an operatic production. This is the kind of post the great,
vast majority (if not ALL) RMO denizens find pleasure and interest in
reading.
Good post Charlie.
Jon E. Szostak, Sr
"REG" wrote in message
> Thanks for this, Charlie. I think this is about as close as I will come to
> a S&D this year, based on your review.
>
> "www.Handelmania.com" wrote in message
>
>>
>> I wish to review the first Met Samson and
>> Delilah of the present season. Generally speaking,it was a satisfying,
>> but not memorable show. The orchestra and especially the chorus were
>> splendid and I found the stylized production more satisfying live than
>> on the previous telecast,although act two lacks the exotic flavor with
>> the absence of a tent and a divan. I did like the lighting effects and
>> the various scrims,and although the Bacchanale was not as exciting as
>> the previous Met production, it was still quite fine,and a highlight of
>> the evening.
>> Marina Domashenko has a very beautiful and rich voice,and act one
>> was especially affecting, but she lacks the power for the heavier act
>> two declamatory scenes, and the lower voice is practically inaudible in
>> a role that demands a Shirley Verrett or a Rise Stevens to make the
>> proper impact. I would prefer to see her in a work that was more lyric
>> throughout, but it is really a beautiful instrument.
>> Clifton Forbis possess a truly Wagnerian size voice.It is
>> not especially beautiful,and at times tends toward throatiness,
>> although the Mill Scene and last scene showed much more of a clearer
>> quality. The top is quite brilliant,and he was a very fine Samson.I did
>> not find myself upset that Placido did not sing, because Mr.Forbis was
>> much more than adequate.The only resemblance to Placido was that the
>> last note was totally hoarse, but we can forgive both Mr.Forbis and the
>> fine Placido. I only wish the effect of the temple falling was more
>> spectacular. Were I a Philistine,I do not think I would be quite that
>> afraid (although some people think of me as a Philistine anyway.)
>> Messieur Lafont evoked the ugly sound of Sergei
>> Leiferkus. His large voice is really about 12th rate in intrinsic
>> quality, and while he acts well, the basic sound is totally
>> objectionable. I also wonder why he, a born Frenchman, sings his final
>> "e" vowels almost like "ey" ( e.g. "gloireh" becomes "gloirey.") It
>> reminded me of the bad French of Franco Corelli, but I feel that
>> Mr.Lafont must decide to produce these vowels in this way for some
>> vocal effect. I only know that there must be at least 50 baritones at
>> the Met who would do justice to this role.
>> Messrs.Coutney and Youn were fine in their act one scenes. I had a
>> nice time,but I would have wanted a Delilah with more heft, and a
>> baritone with a decent voice.
>> My best Charlie >> Stay informed about: Met Samson et Delilah Review |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 22, 2005 Posts: 1018
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 11:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Met Samson et Delilah Review [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | del Monaco/Stevens Samson and Delilah - I have just been listening to one of the first LP's I ever acquired, excerpts from Samson and Delilah with Rise Stevens and Mario del Monaco -on an RCA recording from 1959. It is a terrific recording, I think. Does anyone else know it? I just hope that b...
DVD of SAMSON ET DALILA -
Vicker's Samson - What a great actor he was. Completely inhabiting the role. His huge voice in service to the music and not himself like the apalling Del Monaco. When he sings that the Lord is within him one can believe it. He was unique. Ben
A Night at the Opera - SAMSON - Sunday, May 7 at 7pm A Night at the Opera, hosted by Ken Meltzer Georg Frideric Handel: Samson Jan Peerce, tenor; Phyllis Curtin, soprano; the University of Utah Symphonic Chorale and Utah Symphony Orchestra, Maurice Abravanel, conductor. Jan Peerce..
Please, recommend me a good DVD of Samson et Dalila - Dear friends: Dear friends: Please, recommend me a good DVD of Samson et Delilah. I prefer a traditional realization, not a modern and out of context one, please. Thanks Juan I. Cahis Santiago de Chile (South America) Note: Please forgive me for my.. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|