Ed's group vs. RMO

External Since: Jun 01, 2007 Posts: 155

On Jul 9, 5:12 pm, wkasimer <wkasi... DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 5:01 pm, Silverfin <silverf... DeleteThis @googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >My friend suggested that the group produce a >document, like an FAQ, listing banned terms, but >they didn't go for that idea.
>
> Didn't George Carlin already do that?
>
> Bill

"The 7 words you can't say on TV"

External Since: Jul 07, 2005 Posts: 3595

Your comment seems a bit of a non-sequitur. It makes it difficult to
understand why you are on Parlour if you feel such affection for seeing
people without the thumb of a moderator. I'd think Parlour was quite a
deprivation then, instead of a joy.

"Ken Meltzer" <commspkmn.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1183992678.103788.151000@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 9, 10:44 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 9, 10:37 am, wkasimer <wkasi....TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Jul 9, 10:35 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > Yes. I notice a big difference. As I said, all are civil on my group.
>> > > That is not always, or even usually, the case here.
>>
>> > That's because on RMO, they're not under the thumb of Schoolmarm Ed
>> > Rosen.
>>
>> > Bill
>>
>> So you disdain civility? Believe me, I'm so "schoolmarm." But I do
>> expect and receive a civil post from all, as Elisabetta must on her
>> Opera Parlour. No problem,Bill. Remain here and be subjected to the
>> lack of civility that you seemingly are very fond of.
>>
>> Ed
>
> Ed-
> No offense to your group, as it includes a lot of people I like a
> great deal, you included of course.
> But I'd rather see people for what they are than what they are forced
> to to be when they are under the thumb of a moderator. Believe it or
> not, there actually are people who can behave themselves reasonably
> well without one.
> Best,
> Ken
>