Ed's group vs. RMO

On Jul 9, 9:27 pm, "REG" <Richer... RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
> Your comment seems a bit of a non-sequitur. It makes it difficult to
> understand why you are on Parlour if you feel such affection for seeing
> people without the thumb of a moderator. I'd think Parlour was quite a
> deprivation then, instead of a joy.


Not at all. I'm talking about a small handful of people who frequent
both Ed's group and rmo. AFAIK, none of them is on the Parlour, at
least not after the past few months.
Best,
Ken
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 9:40 pm, "REG" <Richer....TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Passive-aggressive" might be an interesting term for you to look up, Ken.

I guess I made my point.
Best,
Ken
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 10:58 am, wkasimer <wkasi... RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 10:53 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On my group, nobody uses foul language.We're
> > not prudes- just polite.
>
> At the risk of repeating myself,

Risk, Hell, kazzie; it's all you ever do.

>there's a lot more to civility than
> the mere absence of profanity.

And you've none of that 'lot', kazzie. In fact, you're one of the
least civil, most profane, and most sanctimonious pustules anywhere,
along with your cowardly buttboy and 'promoter', la stinque bollmann.

Sincerely,
LT
PS: And you're fungatingly fugly, to boot.

> Bilious Boor

Thanks. Nearly forgot. That, too.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

Ken Meltzer wrote:
> On Jul 9, 10:53 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "My attorny" is my friend, also. I have no right or reason to call him
> > on it here. (snip)
>
> Why not? You called LDM on her use of curse words >here.

And you didn't, Ken. Kinda shows the hypocrite you either became - or
already were.

Which is it?
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 7:51 am, Ken Meltzer <commsp... RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > At least our group is civil, Mark. No one would use language like LDM
> > used a couple of times today, because they would be removed from the
> > group if they did. LJO used the same language. No group needs this
> > kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> > Glad you're reading the "other" group. Perhaps some of it will rub
> > off!!
>
> > Ed
>
> Ed-
> Do you notice any difference in the way people who belong to both your
> group and rmo comport themselves in the two?
> Best,
> Ken

How about a little commentary on your pals' 'comportment' - on any
group, kennie?

Of course, that, you pretend not to notice. As per usual.
You may lower your nose, now.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 9:02 am, wkasimer <wkasi....DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >No one would use language like LDM used a couple of >times today, because they would be removed from the
> >group if they did. LJO used the same language. No >group needs this kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> The horror...the horror...

Your confetti-speck 'bio's' proposed title, no doubt....
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

La Stink Bollmann, the Perv, asks:

>what about the divine "Leonard Tillman"?

I'm your Lovegod and Obsession, Stinky.

*That's* what!

Helpfully,
L. Credit Where Due T., The Divine.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

> Mrs Smith has a lot to answer for.

Geez, Stinky! We didn't know you're now posing as 'Mrs[sicK] Smith'.

Anyway, 'SmittyBoll', when the Sanitation Soldati find your latrine
domicile, with you cowering within, they'll exact the 'answers' you so
richly owe.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 4:26 pm, "ljo" <seniorcubrepor....TakeThisOut@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Just you WAYTE...till I am moderator of this forum.......what a
> > glorious fantasy...... In 1 minute I would improve it
> > immeasurably.....CH
>
> You would improve it best by leaving it.

Stinky, you'd improve the UNIVERSE best by leaving it.
At the immediatest. 'Soonest' isn't soon enough.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 5:17 pm, Mark <mark.clave... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 5:12 pm, wkasimer <wkasi... DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 9, 5:01 pm, Silverfin <silverf... DeleteThis @googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > >My friend suggested that the group produce a >document, like an FAQ, listing banned terms, but >they didn't go for that idea.
>
> > Didn't George Carlin already do that?
>
> > Bill
>
> "The 7 words you can't say on TV"

And you too snot-stains were too stupid to get it even then!

Why would it be different now?
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 9:26 pm, Ken Meltzer <commsp....RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 9:16 pm, Elektra <CharlesHandel....RemoveThis@cs.com> wrote:
>
> > The jealous idiot would love to have kniown Tebaldi..but why an I
> > bothering speaking to a mental case whose lover is Hagen....
>
> Because when you first came to rmo 100 years ago,

There was no RMO 100 years ago, kennie. We realize it's a shock to
you, but you seem to need it.

>LJO made fun of your
> opera posts?

'made fun', kennie? You certainly have a way of 'spinning' the
situation to suit your obvious preferences.

It's also called 'lying'.

> Best,
> Ken

Best at lying? You've the Boll-tone System to guide you to
pluperfection, there.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 9:31 pm, Ken Meltzer <commsp... DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 9:27 pm, "REG" <Richer... DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Your comment seems a bit of a non-sequitur. It makes it difficult to
> > understand why you are on Parlour if you feel such affection for seeing
> > people without the thumb of a moderator. I'd think Parlour was quite a
> > deprivation then, instead of a joy.
>
> Not at all. I'm talking about a small handful of people who frequent
> both Ed's group and rmo. AFAIK, none of them is on the Parlour, at
> least not after the past few months.

So what, kennie?

Are you now 'challenging' us to participate on Parlour?

We may, and we may not. It's none of your business either way.

Thx for your concern.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

> Just you WAYTE...till I am moderator of this forum.......what a
> glorious fantasy...... In 1 minute I would improve it
> immeasurably.....CH
>

You would improve it best by leaving it.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO