Ed's group vs. RMO

On 9 Jul, 00:14, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 8, 11:36 pm, Mark <mark.clave....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Couldn't help but see that there were only a handful of posts today on
> > Ed's group. On the other hand, the was an avalanche of posts on RMO
> > from ED's major posters. They were mostly not nice posts. What's up
> > with that?
> > Bannedelman, Tillman and donpaolo were all here making trouble. Ed's
> > group must be too tame for these posters.
>
> At least our group is civil, Mark. No one would use language like LDM
> used a couple of times today, because they would be removed from the
> group if they did. LJO used the same language. No group needs this
> kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> Glad you're reading the "other" group. Perhaps some of it will rub
> off!!
>
> Ed

ED...All we have to do...so obvious and predictable..is read my OPERA
posts this week..and see WHO PUTS THEM DOWN??

THAT is the difference between your group and RMO...Just list the 5 or
6 people who should have their own private group....and not infect any
other nice group of people....same same same..

Instigation???Geee....I wonder who is doing it???


I will write about opera here for those who appreciate it....the
others..who cares????
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On 9 Jul, 10:44, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 10:37 am, wkasimer <wkasi... DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 9, 10:35 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Yes. I notice a big difference. As I said, all are civil on my group.
> > > That is not always, or even usually, the case here.
>
> > That's because on RMO, they're not under the thumb of Schoolmarm Ed
> > Rosen.
>
> > Bill
>
> So you disdain civility? Believe me, I'm so "schoolmarm." But I do
> expect and receive a civil post from all, as Elisabetta must on her
> Opera Parlour. No problem,Bill. Remain here and be subjected to the
> lack of civility that you seemingly are very fond of.
>
> Ed

Just you WAYTE...till I am moderator of this forum.......what a
glorious fantasy...... In 1 minute I would improve it
immeasurably.....CH
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

you too !

On Jul 9, 1:26 pm, "ljo" <seniorcubrepor....RemoveThis@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Just you WAYTE...till I am moderator of this forum.......what a
> > glorious fantasy...... In 1 minute I would improve it
> > immeasurably.....CH
>
> You would improve it best by leaving it.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 5:01 pm, Silverfin <silverf....TakeThisOut@googlemail.com> wrote:

>My friend suggested that the group produce a >document, like an FAQ, listing banned terms, but >they didn't go for that idea.

Didn't George Carlin already do that?

Bill
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 5:01 pm, Silverfin <silverf....RemoveThis@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Without wishing to take sides, it can be quite difficult to remember
> which words one can and cannot use on different groups. (snip)

It's particularly difficult when the word in question is used all the
time on that group.
Best,
Ken
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

Fast Eddie Rosen wrote:

> On Jul 8, 11:36 pm, Mark <mark.clave....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Couldn't help but see that there were only a handful of posts today on
>> Ed's group. On the other hand, the was an avalanche of posts on RMO
>> from ED's major posters. They were mostly not nice posts. What's up
>> with that?
>> Bannedelman, Tillman and donpaolo were all here making trouble. Ed's
>> group must be too tame for these posters.
>
> At least our group is civil, Mark. No one would use language like LDM
> used a couple of times today, because they would be removed from the
> group if they did. LJO used the same language. No group needs this
> kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> Glad you're reading the "other" group. Perhaps some of it will rub
> off!!
>
> Ed
>

And what about the divine "Leonard Tillman"?
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

Ed Rosen wrote,

> On Jul 9, 9:02 am, wkasimer <wkasi... DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>> On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >No one would use language like LDM used a couple of >times today,
>> >because they would be removed from the
>> >group if they did. LJO used the same language. No >group needs this kind
>> >of rudeness, IMHO.
>>
>> The horror...the horror...
>
> If you enjoy reading foul language, Bill, I would think there are many
> more and different you could visit that would give you a real earful
> of this peculiar kind of enjoyment."

We get plenty of that from your attorney, Ed. You don't have the guts to
call him on it here. Nor do you have the guts to moderate him at your
incredibly blissful opera haven.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

ljo wrote:
> Ed Rosen wrote,
>
>> On Jul 9, 9:02 am, wkasimer <wkasi....DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> No one would use language like LDM used a couple of >times today,
>>>> because they would be removed from the
>>>> group if they did. LJO used the same language. No >group needs this kind
>>>> of rudeness, IMHO.
>>> The horror...the horror...
>> If you enjoy reading foul language, Bill, I would think there are many
>> more and different you could visit that would give you a real earful
>> of this peculiar kind of enjoyment."
>
> We get plenty of that from your attorney, Ed. You don't have the guts to
> call him on it here. Nor do you have the guts to moderate him at your
> incredibly blissful opera haven.
>
>

I think the mistake I made in Ed's eyes was not being 'ladylike'. As I
have never wished to lower myself to being 'ladylike', I am not
frightfully bothered if Ed was offended by a bit of Anglo-Saxon.
Sometimes I forget that language chnages its meaning as it travels.
It's always struck me as bizarre that people get more het up about
swearing than about violence, death wishes, personal insults. Maybe
that's just my peculiarity.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

"La Donna Mobile" <enidlareg2.DeleteThis@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:jL-dndzxqJtLzA_bnZ2dnUVZ8surnZ2d@bt.com...
> ljo wrote:
>> Ed Rosen wrote,
>>
>>> On Jul 9, 9:02 am, wkasimer <wkasi....DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No one would use language like LDM used a couple of >times today,
>>>>> because they would be removed from the
>>>>> group if they did. LJO used the same language. No >group needs this
>>>>> kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>>>> The horror...the horror...
>>> If you enjoy reading foul language, Bill, I would think there are many
>>> more and different you could visit that would give you a real earful
>>> of this peculiar kind of enjoyment."
>>
>> We get plenty of that from your attorney, Ed. You don't have the guts to
>> call him on it here. Nor do you have the guts to moderate him at your
>> incredibly blissful opera haven.
>
> I think the mistake I made in Ed's eyes was not being 'ladylike'. As I
> have never wished to lower myself to being 'ladylike', I am not
> frightfully bothered if Ed was offended by a bit of Anglo-Saxon. >

> Sometimes I forget that language chnages its meaning as it travels. It's
> always struck me as bizarre that people get more het up about swearing
> than about violence, death wishes, personal insults. Maybe that's just my
> peculiarity. >

Never mind Ed, my darling. He is burdened by selective sensitivity. He is
tolerant of thousands of repulsive posts by his attorney friend, death
wishes etc from Handelman and Tillman, yet throws a hairy fit over the f
word. RMO would certainly welcome a bit of ladylike behavior from those
goons.

ljo, curtseying sweetly . .
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

>From the archives:
Charles Handelman posing as La Voce di Vendetta wrote:

That is right..You DESERVE instigation..since you are examples of the
filth that invades nice people's lives...You should hide your three
heads in shame for what you are......remember..NONE of this would
happen if you hhad not begun all the instigation..you and your moronic
buddies..begone...ch
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

>> Never mind Ed, my darling. He is burdened by selective sensitivity. He is
>> tolerant of thousands of repulsive posts by his attorney friend, death
>> wishes etc from Handelman and Tillman, yet throws a hairy fit over the f
>> word. RMO would certainly welcome a bit of ladylike behavior from those
>> goons.
>>
>> ljo, curtseying sweetly . .- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Remember.....if you go backto the archives and see that YOU YOU YOU
> started making fun of my opera posts..you will understand why you are
> hated.....ch
>

And here was me thinking that was why I am revered.
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 9:16 pm, Elektra <CharlesHandel... RemoveThis @cs.com> wrote:

> The jealous idiot would love to have kniown Tebaldi..but why an I
> bothering speaking to a mental case whose lover is Hagen....

Because when you first came to rmo 100 years ago, LJO made fun of your
opera posts?
Best,
Ken
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On 9 Jul, 00:14, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 8, 11:36 pm, Mark <mark.clave....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Couldn't help but see that there were only a handful of posts today on
> > Ed's group. On the other hand, the was an avalanche of posts on RMO
> > from ED's major posters. They were mostly not nice posts. What's up
> > with that?
> > Bannedelman, Tillman and donpaolo were all here making trouble. Ed's
> > group must be too tame for these posters.
>
> At least our group is civil, Mark. No one would use language like LDM
> used a couple of times today, because they would be removed from the
> group if they did. LJO used the same language. No group needs this
> kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> Glad you're reading the "other" group. Perhaps some of it will rub
> off!!
>
> Ed

ED...All we need to do is read an opera post and then see who makes
fun of it..the same group..Garbage loves garbage..and that will NEVER
change.......pathetic...I do not know why I lower myself to post
here..Maybe I have an s/m quality...CH
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO