Ed's group vs. RMO

On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:

> At least our group is civil, Mark. No one would use language like LDM
> used a couple of times today, because they would be removed from the
> group if they did. LJO used the same language. No group needs this
> kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> Glad you're reading the "other" group. Perhaps some of it will rub
> off!!
>
> Ed

Ed-
Do you notice any difference in the way people who belong to both your
group and rmo comport themselves in the two?
Best,
Ken
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:

>No one would use language like LDM used a couple of >times today, because they would be removed from the
>group if they did. LJO used the same language. No >group needs this kind of rudeness, IMHO.

The horror...the horror...
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 7:51 am, Ken Meltzer <commsp....DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > At least our group is civil, Mark. No one would use language like LDM
> > used a couple of times today, because they would be removed from the
> > group if they did. LJO used the same language. No group needs this
> > kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> > Glad you're reading the "other" group. Perhaps some of it will rub
> > off!!
>
> > Ed
>
> Ed-
> Do you notice any difference in the way people who belong to both your
> group and rmo comport themselves in the two?
> Best,
> Ken

Yes. I notice a big difference. As I said, all are civil on my group.
That is not always, or even usually, the case here.

Best,
Ed
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 9:02 am, wkasimer <wkasi... DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >No one would use language like LDM used a couple of >times today, because they would be removed from the
> >group if they did. LJO used the same language. No >group needs this kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> The horror...the horror...

If you enjoy reading foul language, Bill, I would think there are many
more and different you could visit that would give you a real earful
of this peculiar kind of enjoyment. Speaking for myself, it is a
horror.

Ed
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 10:35 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes. I notice a big difference. As I said, all are civil on my group.
> That is not always, or even usually, the case here.

That's because on RMO, they're not under the thumb of Schoolmarm Ed
Rosen.

Bill
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 10:35 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 7:51 am, Ken Meltzer <commsp... DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > At least our group is civil, Mark. No one would use language like LDM
> > > used a couple of times today, because they would be removed from the
> > > group if they did. LJO used the same language. No group needs this
> > > kind of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> > > Glad you're reading the "other" group. Perhaps some of it will rub
> > > off!!
>
> > > Ed
>
> > Ed-
> > Do you notice any difference in the way people who belong to both your
> > group and rmo comport themselves in the two?
> > Best,
> > Ken
>
> Yes. I notice a big difference. As I said, all are civil on my group.
> That is not always, or even usually, the case here.
>
> Best,
> Ed

Thanks, Ed.
Best,
Ken
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 10:37 am, wkasimer <wkasi....DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 10:35 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes. I notice a big difference. As I said, all are civil on my group.
> > That is not always, or even usually, the case here.
>
> That's because on RMO, they're not under the thumb of Schoolmarm Ed
> Rosen.
>
> Bill

So you disdain civility? Believe me, I'm so "schoolmarm." But I do
expect and receive a civil post from all, as Elisabetta must on her
Opera Parlour. No problem,Bill. Remain here and be subjected to the
lack of civility that you seemingly are very fond of.

Ed
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 10:44 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:

> So you disdain civility?

Not at all, Ed. You're among those tossing F-bombs around RMO, not
me.

> But I do
> expect and receive a civil post from all,

But only, apparently, on your own forum. If you want to use gutter
language, you come over to RMO, along with the rest of your merry
band.

What a hypocrite.

Bill
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 10:44 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 10:37 am, wkasimer <wkasi... DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 9, 10:35 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Yes. I notice a big difference. As I said, all are civil on my group.
> > > That is not always, or even usually, the case here.
>
> > That's because on RMO, they're not under the thumb of Schoolmarm Ed
> > Rosen.
>
> > Bill
>
> So you disdain civility? Believe me, I'm so "schoolmarm." But I do
> expect and receive a civil post from all, as Elisabetta must on her
> Opera Parlour. No problem,Bill. Remain here and be subjected to the
> lack of civility that you seemingly are very fond of.
>
> Ed

Ed-
No offense to your group, as it includes a lot of people I like a
great deal, you included of course.
But I'd rather see people for what they are than what they are forced
to to be when they are under the thumb of a moderator. Believe it or
not, there actually are people who can behave themselves reasonably
well without one.
Best,
Ken
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 10:50 am, "ljo" <seniorcubrepor....TakeThisOut@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Ed Rosen wrote,
>
> > On Jul 9, 9:02 am, wkasimer <wkasi....TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >No one would use language like LDM used a couple of >times today,
> >> >because they would be removed from the
> >> >group if they did. LJO used the same language. No >group needs this kind
> >> >of rudeness, IMHO.
>
> >> The horror...the horror...
>
> > If you enjoy reading foul language, Bill, I would think there are many
> > more and different you could visit that would give you a real earful
> > of this peculiar kind of enjoyment."
>
> We get plenty of that from your attorney, Ed. You don't have the guts to
> call him on it here. Nor do you have the guts to moderate him at your
> incredibly blissful opera haven.

"My attorny" is my friend, also. I have no right or reason to call him
on it here. And after yesterday's outblast from you, you are no one to
talk about foul language. On my group, nobody uses foul language.We're
not prudes- just polite.

Ed
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 10:53 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:

> "My attorny" is my friend, also. I have no right or reason to call him
> on it here. (snip)

Why not? You called LDM on her use of curse words here.
Best,
Ken
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On Jul 9, 10:53 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:

> On my group, nobody uses foul language.We're
> not prudes- just polite.

At the risk of repeating myself, there's a lot more to civility than
the mere absence of profanity.

Bill
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO 

On 9 Jul, 12:07, "ljo" <seniorcubrepor....DeleteThis@earthlink.net> wrote:
> "La Donna Mobile" <enidlar....DeleteThis@btinternet.com> wrote in messagenews:jL-dndzxqJtLzA_bnZ2dnUVZ8surnZ2d@bt.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > ljo wrote:
> >> Ed Rosen wrote,
>
> >>> On Jul 9, 9:02 am, wkasimer <wkasi....DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>> On Jul 9, 12:14 am, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> No one would use language like LDM used a couple of >times today,
> >>>>> because they would be removed from the
> >>>>> group if they did. LJO used the same language. No >group needs this
> >>>>> kind of rudeness, IMHO.
> >>>> The horror...the horror...
> >>> If you enjoy reading foul language, Bill, I would think there are many
> >>> more and different you could visit that would give you a real earful
> >>> of this peculiar kind of enjoyment."
>
> >> We get plenty of that from your attorney, Ed. You don't have the guts to
> >> call him on it here. Nor do you have the guts to moderate him at your
> >> incredibly blissful opera haven.
>
> > I think the mistake I made in Ed's eyes was not being 'ladylike'. As I
> > have never wished to lower myself to being 'ladylike', I am not
> > frightfully bothered if Ed was offended by a bit of Anglo-Saxon. >
> > Sometimes I forget that language chnages its meaning as it travels. It's
> > always struck me as bizarre that people get more het up about swearing
> > than about violence, death wishes, personal insults. Maybe that's just my
> > peculiarity. >
>
> Never mind Ed, my darling. He is burdened by selective sensitivity. He is
> tolerant of thousands of repulsive posts by his attorney friend, death
> wishes etc from Handelman and Tillman, yet throws a hairy fit over the f
> word. RMO would certainly welcome a bit of ladylike behavior from those
> goons.
>
> ljo, curtseying sweetly . .- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Remember.....if you go backto the archives and see that YOU YOU YOU
started making fun of my opera posts..you will understand why you are
hated.....ch
 >> Stay informed about: Ed's group vs. RMO